home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=91TT0784>
- <title>
- Apr. 15, 1991: America Abroad
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
- Apr. 15, 1991 Saddam's Latest Victims
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- WORLD, Page 30
- AMERICA ABROAD
- When Monsters Stay Home
- </hdr><body>
- <p>By Strobe Talbott
- </p>
- <p> At first the winners of the gulf war congratulated
- themselves for re-establishing the taboo against aggression:
- invade a neighboring state, and you'll be sorry. But now the
- loser in the war has exploited an awkward corollary: stay on
- your own territory, wrap yourself in the cloak of sovereignty,
- and you can do anything you want. Having been punished for
- violating the sanctity of borders, Saddam Hussein has found
- protection behind that same principle as he commits atrocities
- against his own citizens.
- </p>
- <p> The problem here is not just George Bush's double cross of
- the Iraqi rebels. Once again the world community has defined
- its interests and obligations too narrowly, concerning itself
- with what happens between and among nations rather than what
- happens inside them.
- </p>
- <p> Before and during the war, Bush constantly compared Saddam
- with Adolf HitNow critics are asking why the Butcher of Baghdad--and Karbala and Kirkuk--is still President of Iraq. The
- answer is that since withdrawing from Kuwait, Saddam has been
- playing by accepted rules; his abominations are once again in
- the category of internal affairs. Which suggests a disturbing
- line of speculation about Hitler himself: What if the Fuhrer had
- resisted the temptations of conquest and been content with the
- real estate of the Weimar Republic to build the Third Reich,
- complete with gas chambers and ovens? Would the world have done
- anything about him?
- </p>
- <p> There is reason for doubt. In the 1970s Pol Pot
- slaughtered as many as 2 million Cambodians. But he was a
- stay-at-home Hitler, so the world merely tut-tutted. When
- Vietnam finally invaded Cambodia in 1978 and evicted the Khmer
- Rouge from Phnom Penh, the United Nations in effect judged
- intervention to be an evil greater than genocide. During the
- cold war, geopolitics often overrode morality and common sense
- alike. Vietnam was a Soviet ally; therefore its thrust into
- Cambodia was perceived, and condemned, as part of the Kremlin's
- global offensive.
- </p>
- <p> Now that the cold war is over, intervention need no longer
- be quite so suspect as a cynical gambit on the East-West
- chessboard. The concept of benevolent interference is already
- coming back into fashion. Last year, while Liberia was in the
- throes of its tribal self-immolation, five European envoys in
- Monrovia pleaded for the U.S. to send in troops to stop the
- killing. "The interdependence of nations," said an Italian
- diplomat, "no longer permits other nations to sit idle while one
- country plunges into anarchy and national suicide." Or, he might
- have added, mass murder at the hand of its leader.
- </p>
- <p> Last week Lord Hartley Shawcross, who was the chief
- British prosecutor at the Nazi war crimes trials at Nuremberg,
- warned that "international law will be a dead letter unless we
- give criminal jurisdiction to the International Court of
- Justice and set up a mechanism for enforcing its judgments." The
- use of force against monster regimes will be easier to justify
- if sanctioned and undertaken by a multilateral body, presumably
- the U.N. As Desert Storm showed, the U.S. is as well suited to
- the role of a sheriff leading a posse as to that of the Lone
- Ranger.
- </p>
- <p> Saddam's rape of Kuwait and the coalition's bold response
- helped resuscitate the old idea of collective security. Perhaps
- the sickening spectacle of what the same coalition is letting
- Saddam do now will stimulate the world toward a genuinely new
- idea: collective responsibility for the behavior of governments
- toward their own people.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-